🔄🚀 One-Click Cross-Chain Transactions

Real-World Value 💡

• Simplicity: Single flow for multi-hop, cross-chain transfers.

• Efficiency: Optimizes cost/latency; fails over to alternate paths automatically.

• Safety: Atomic settlement prevents partial execution; clear UX for fees/slippage.

Problems Solved 🛠️

• Eliminates manual bridge/DEX choice and fee/slippage guesswork.

• Reduces failed routes and mis-sends; lowers total execution cost.

• Harmonizes confirmations, receipts, and status tracking across chains.

Technical Architecture 🧱

• Liquidity network modeled as a weighted graph (edges = bridges/AMMs/routes with costs for gas, latency, depth, risk).

• Dijkstra-class shortest-path with real-time weights; HTLC/atomic-swap settlement and path failover.

• Microservices: price/quoter, pathfinder, signer, settlement, reconciliation; MEV-aware execution where supported.

Mathematical Modelling 📐

• Composite cost function: C(path)=α⋅gas+β⋅latency+γ⋅priceImpact+δ⋅risk+ε⋅reliabilityPenaltyC(path) = \alpha \cdot gas + \beta \cdot latency + \gamma \cdot priceImpact + \delta \cdot risk + \varepsilon \cdot reliabilityPenaltyC(path)=α⋅gas+β⋅latency+γ⋅priceImpact+δ⋅risk+ε⋅reliabilityPenalty

• Constraints: minimum liquidity depth, maximum slippage, time-to-finality bounds.

• Dynamic re-pricing from orderbooks, bridge quotes, and gas oracles.

Explanations 🗒️

• Atomicity ensures either all hops settle or none do.

• Re-pricing avoids stale quotes; failover selects the next best route.